Figurine dating aaron hudon canadian dating web postings

I enjoy researching so I thought I would give it a go.Through Web articles and a couple of books I determined that NM 572 was a Goebel series/model number.So ultimately, here is the information I seek: Does anyone know under what conditions and when the Goebel Company would not have put a stamped or incised mark one of their products? Pat Hi Pat Your article is perhaps the most exhaustive piece of research I have ever had on this China Chat forum in 10 years. Right off the bat, if I had seen this piece without your research, I would have also written it off as a Goebel type copy - likely from the Far East.

I have always been a random collector of ceramic items, bought only because they had a certain attraction.

Occupied by Neanderthals during the Middle Paleolithic, scholars believe that they were displaced around 30,000 BCE by the first wave of "modern man", a view supported by the fact that the earliest directly-dated modern human remains from Kostenky date to about 30,000 BCE.

At any rate, from then on, Kostenky was repeatedly occupied by hunter-gatherers during the Gravettian or "Willendorf-Kostenki" culture, and scholars believe it was modern man who created the earliest art of the area.

After that, it sat in my china closet for a very long time.

However recently, the more I stared at it, the more I began to wonder if it were possible to determine its history.

Search for figurine dating:

figurine dating-39figurine dating-35

I do have 1933 – 1958 but that’s a very broad range.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “figurine dating”