Percent of responses from women online dating
Finally, my message style was the same: I remarked on and asked questions about specific aspects of her profile; used language that leads to more responses; and included humor.In other words, the only factor that varied was my height.I contacted 31 young women and compared the response rate to the 31 I had messaged before the height change.For those who responded, I replied that I had increased my height for this article and apologized for misrepresenting myself.The only way short guys survive is by knowing that we live longer and can weave through Costco aisles faster than our taller, wealthier, calmer, happier and more powerful, popular, employable, educated and sexually active counterparts. which we use to barter extra tater tots at school lunch.Shortness is great when we are four years old and get to hold the plaque in our soccer team photo. Grade school teachers find our smallness endearing and award us extra stickers and desired parts in class plays.
I got dates out of this experiment from two lovely young women who said they didn't value height.Isn’t it just better to hang out in the produce aisle and ask women how to tell if a cantaloupe is ripe?At least then you’re pretty much guaranteed to get some kind of response, right? A full third of guys who try online dating sites and apps never go on a single date, and that’s despite spending 5.2 hours a week looking at profiles, then another 6.7 hours sending out messages.College girls can't find us in the sea of giant guys at frat parties.Young women can see us, but not as potential partners when our eye levels aren't at least equal when they wear heels. Is that correct, or are we just in denial about some more profound traits that make us unattractive?